logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2014.08.22 2014고단2080
도로교통법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving a BD car.

On May 14, 2014, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.175% on blood alcohol level on May 14, 2014, 200: (a) 10:37, the Defendant was driving on the two-lane road in front of the New Fanst apartment in Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu, Seoul at the 7-lane 7-ro, along the two-lane from the nive distance towards the south circulation.

Since signal lights are installed on the front side, the driver of a motor vehicle is obliged to observe the traffic signal while under the influence of alcohol and accurately operate the steering and steering gear, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by driving the motor vehicle at a speed or in such a manner as not posing any danger and obstacle to others according to the traffic situation of the road and the structure and performance of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not properly operate the steering gear while under the influence of alcohol, and caused the damage of property equivalent to approximately KRW 6,276,50,00, such as the replacement of Switzerland risk to the front part of the driver car, which was installed between the road on the side of the Southern-ro Metropolitan City and the ancient apartment road.

2. On May 14, 2014, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol 0.175% on blood alcohol level on May 14, 2014, the Defendant driven a B tea car at a 1km section from the front side of Yangcheon-gu Seoul, Yangcheon-gu to the front side of the new green apartment with the same burden from the front side of Yangcheon-gu, Seoul to the new green apartment with the same burden of 0.175%.

3. Although the defendant is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle on the road which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, he shall not operate the motor vehicle on the road. However, the defendant as a holder of a Dayp motor vehicle, without mandatory insurance, shall operate the vehicle on the date and place mentioned in the above paragraph

arrow