beta
Text
All appeals by the defendant and the prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
The gist of the grounds for appeal lies in the mental and physical state, such as suffering from mental illness due to cerebral disease at the time of each of the crimes in this case.
The punishment sentenced by the court below to the defendant (three years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
The sentence sentenced by the court below against the defendant is too unfortunate and unfair.
Since the defendant who is not subject to disclosure or notification order shows violent tendency to women who are the weak and women who are the other party to the work, there is a possibility that victims of subparagraphs 2 and 3 may occur.
Therefore, it is improper to exempt the defendant from disclosure and notification order.
Judgment
According to the judgment of the court below and the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below as to the defendant's argument of mental disorder, the defendant was hospitalized into brain mathy infection, and thereafter there was a mathy and walking disorder to the right side of the defendant, and the defendant was diagnosed at Grade 5 on July 25, 2002, and the defendant was diagnosed at Grade 5 on brain mathy, around July 25, 2002, and there was a optomic colony, efficiencies, efficiencies, and self-centered disorder.
However, in light of the above evidence, the Defendant’s walk is somewhat inconvenient, but without any big inconvenience, went through a school and graduated from a junior college, etc., and the Defendant’s direct operation of the mobile phone sales store with the help of his family from around 2012 can be acknowledged. In addition to the above facts, the Defendant’s motive and circumstance of each of the instant crimes, and the Defendant’s statement attitude and content at the investigative agency and the court, and all of the circumstances revealed in the instant pleadings, including the Defendant’s statement attitude and content, etc., at the time of each of the instant crimes, the Defendant had the 5th degree 5 degree th degree th degree th degree 5 as above at the time
This is also a result.