1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted by the plaintiff was presented by this court, it is recognized that the facts of the court of first instance

Accordingly, the reasoning of the judgment of this court is as follows: “No. 1, 2, 4, and 6 of the evidence No. 3-1, 2, 2, and 6” of the second 18 of the judgment of the court of first instance; “No. 3-2” of the second 18 shall be added to “No. 3-1, 2, 4, and 6 of the evidence No. 3-2; and “No. 2, 2014” of the third 18 of the judgment shall be deemed as “No. 16, 2014.” The following is added to the third 18 of the judgment of the court

The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant banner is subject to an administrative fine at the time of installation of illegal advertisements, even if it is controlled by the Defendant, it can be reduced or exempted by consultation with the employees of the Gu office, and thus, even though the administrative fine per banner is approximately KRW 120,00,000 per banner, the Plaintiff’s assertion that the contract should be additionally entered into in addition to the amount of KRW 5,00 per banner does not have a

Since the unit price for banner production may vary depending on various factors, such as the timing of production, number of production, size, transaction status, and timing of payment, it is difficult to readily conclude that the average unit price for banner production is about KRW 5,00 per head, as alleged by the Plaintiff.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is without merit, and it shall be dismissed. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.