The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On December 18, 2019, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a service contract that the Plaintiff managed the administrative fine of the Gu office that may impose on the advertising banner produced and installed by the Defendant (the Defendant was requested to manufacture a banner for the advertisement of D buildings, and the Defendant was manufactured at the request of the selling agency, and the Defendant would have been installed in the Seocho-gu jurisdiction) on the advertising banner produced and installed by the Defendant (the advertising banner that would be installed in the Seo-gu jurisdiction).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant service contract”). (b)

The instant service contract was a contract (management of a fine for negligence and payment contract) under which the Plaintiff would pay the fine for negligence on behalf of the Gu office in the event that the fine for negligence was imposed by the Gu office of the month because both the Defendant’s sales advertising banner produced and installed was illegal advertisements, but the Plaintiff was responsible for the management of the fine for negligence for four weeks from the date of the contract, but the Plaintiff was liable for the last banner within one week from the date of delivery, and the Defendant shall pay the service price calculated by 17,000 won per banner to the Plaintiff.

C. According to the instant service contract, the Defendant was obliged to issue a monthly order of 2,000 copies.

No later than January 8, 2020, a banner of 1,500 was manufactured and installed, and no more additional request was made from the side of the person who requested the production of the banner, and no subsequent delivery of the banner was made.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, partial testimony of witness E, witness F's testimony, and whole purport of pleading

2. The agreed contractual term of the instant service contract was three months (from December 19, 2019 to March 19, 2020).

For this reason, the plaintiff employed five employees to board in Daegu local area, and prepared to perform the plaintiff's obligations under the service contract of this case.

However, the defendant unilaterally enters into a contract at least three weeks after the contract began.