A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Punishment of the crime

On November 27, 2017, the Defendant: (a) visited the victim E (30 years of age) who visited the above house in order to extract a person from a breath in a breath of “D” type “D” in a breath of light at around 23:55, the Defendant assaulted twice the victim’s right part of the breath with the victim’s own drinking and hand, and subsequently, the Defendant breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of the breath of

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A report on investigation (to hear statements by shots);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. As to the assertion of mental and physical weakness regarding criminal facts, the pertinent Article of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of punishment, the Defendant was in a physical and mental state by drinking

As such, according to the Defendant’s statement at an investigative agency, it is acknowledged that the Defendant was in a state that he lacks the ability to distinguish things or make decisions due to drinking, in light of the fact that the Defendant was well aware of such fact, and that the Defendant was in a state that he was in a state that he lacks the ability to distinguish things or make decisions due to drinking at the time of committing the crime.

It is difficult to evaluate.

Therefore, the above argument is not accepted.

The reason for sentencing is that the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime in the past, and even during the period of probation and protection observation, he/she again committed the crime of this case under the influence of alcohol. Therefore, it is inevitable to treat the defendant within the facility.

On the other hand, taking into account the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim and appeared to reflect his fault.