logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원서산지원 2020.03.31 2019가단3792
건물인도
Text

1. The defendant 3 floors of reinforced concrete structure C in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun (flive slabs) roof.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including household numbers) as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff and the defendant concluded a lease agreement with the defendant on December 8, 2015, setting a period of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 1 on the attached map Nos. 1, 3, 4, 5, and 59 square meters (hereinafter referred to as "the instant store") among the three floors of reinforced concrete C, Danam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, the plaintiff owned on December 8, 2015, and the defendant again notified the defendant of the fact that the lease agreement was concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant on December 30, 2015 and 90,000 won (hereinafter referred to as "the instant store") for a period of 200,000 won or more during which the lease agreement was concluded between the plaintiff and the defendant and the defendant on November 19, 2019, respectively.

Therefore, barring any other special circumstances, the Defendant is obligated to deliver the instant store to the Plaintiff by performing the duty of restoration upon termination of the instant lease agreement.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow