Text
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 220,00,000 for the Plaintiff and 6% per annum from April 1, 2016 to April 26, 2017; and (b) the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a company running environmental facility design and technical resource service business, and the Defendant is a company running an engineering work business, building work business, packing work business, landscaping work business, etc.
Technical Services Contract Documents
1. Name of a service contract: Civil engineering design and urban planning services provided for in B and F;
2. Contract term: For three months from the contract date;
3. Amount of a service contract: Amount of KRW 300,000,000 in a daily fee (excluding KRW 300,000,00 in addition tax).
4. Contract performance guarantee: 10% of the contract amount (to be replaced by a note); and
5. Method of payment: The method of payment shall be in accordance with Articles 7 and 8 of the General Terms and Conditions of the service contract. G of the ordering person, the representative director G of the Defendant, and the representative director of the Plaintiff, shall conclude this technical service contract in accordance with all the terms and conditions of the service contract (as defined in Article 2 of the General Conditions of the
The purpose of this service is to ensure that the work is efficiently promoted in performing the I Urban Development Project Development Plan and Working Design (United Unit Planning Service) Services.
Article 5 (Period of Service) The period of this service shall be from January 2016 to six months, and may be adjusted pursuant to any of the following subparagraphs:
1. Where it is necessary to extend the service period due to the delay of the consultation date of the related agency;
2. Where extension is inevitably required due to the circumstances of the defendant;
3. In other cases where the defendant and the plaintiff deem it necessary to extend the service period through consultation, the scope of the service under Article 6 (Scope of Services) shall exercise overall control over the authorization and permission affairs, and detailed matters shall be as follows:
1. Changing working plans for construction works;
2. Change of urban planning services following the Corporation;
3. The defendant shall pay the design service cost to the plaintiff in cash as follows.
After January 100,000,000 after February 1, 2000, the total of 100,000,000,000 after the contract with the former non-high-end gold amount of 10,00,000,000 V.A.T.