A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) entered the site of the studio new construction works in Sejong-si, Sejong-si; (b) and (c) stolen the victim E’s steel bars worth KRW 100,000 at the market price of 10,000,000, which are owned by D, from May 19, 2013.

2. On July 2013, around 20:00, the Defendant: (a) stolen, from the beginning of July 2013, the KRW 10,000,000 of the steel plates covered for the protection of street trees owned by the victim corporation I, the victim of the damage, which is managed by H, in front of the Gwa Holdings, on the street in the above F, on the hand of hand.

3. The Defendant: (a) entered the site of the studio construction works located in J in the beginning of the same month; (b) laid down the victim L, which K manages, with the amounting to KRW 1,00,000,000 in the market value of the iron owned by the victim L, and stolen the said amount.

4. At around 19:00 on the early 19:00 of the same month, the Defendant: (a) stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 200,000,00 of the steel price owned by the Victim Co., Ltd., Ltd. and managed by N, by entering the studio construction site in the above M; and (b) stolen the said amount.

5. At around 20:00 on the same month, the Defendant: (a) took a theft of the amount of KRW 1,00,000 at the market price of ten iron plates owned by the victim I for the protection of street trees owned by H at the same place as the above paragraph (2).

6. At around August 23:30 of the same year, the Defendant: (a) went to the site of the studio new construction works in P and stolen the amount equivalent to KRW 1,000,000,000 from the market price of the iron owned by Q to the victim R owned by Q.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning the suspect of the police against S;

1. Written statements of D, H, N, K, and Q;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crimes;

1. Among concurrent crimes, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act are as follows: (a) each of the larceny of this case has been repeatedly committed by the same several methods; (b) there is a history of larceny; and (c) the victims have not been recovered from the injury; and (d) the defendant is more likely to have committed the crime than the frequency of the crimes.