A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From April 1, 2015 to August 31, 2015, the Defendant is a person who served as the head of the management office at the site of the “D Corporation” located in Gangseo-si Office of Education where the victim B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) was the head of Gangseo-si Office of Education (hereinafter “D Corporation”).

1. The Defendant filed a false labor report with respect to those who do not work in the above construction site while working as the manager of the above construction site and received payment from the affected company to the relevant labor workers, he/she would receive the return of the false labor report or claim labor cost for those who work in a place other than the above construction site as if they were working in the above construction site.

On May 2015, the Defendant requested the damaged company located in Chuncheon E to pay labor costs by falsely stating, “The labor workers listed in the labor report have performed work at the above construction site.”

However, there was no fact that labor workers listed in the above labor report did work at the above construction site.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victimized company, had the victimized company transfer KRW 8,418,360 from June 12, 2015 to the account of false labor personnel, such as F, etc. designated by the Defendant, under the pretext of labor expenses stated in the false labor report, and acquired KRW 38,118,680 in the same way from around that time to September 16, 2015, as shown in the attached crime list.

2. Fraud claiming false materials cost;

A. On April 30, 2015, from around August 31, 2015 to around August 31, 2015, the Defendant falsely requested the payment of the price of materials, stating that “The Defendant received the construction materials from “H” operated by G, and thus, paid KRW 5,541,580.”

However, there was no fact that construction materials were supplied from H.

The defendant.