Defendant

The appeal is dismissed.

The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair punishment) of the original judgment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

It is reasonable to consider the fact that the defendant led to the crime of this case and reflects his mistake in depth, that there is no record of punishment for the same crime, and that there is no record of punishment.

In light of the fact that the crime of this case was displayed or kept 50 game machines that provide speculative game products in the course of operating the illegal game room with no trade name, and that the liability for the crime is not less severe, and that it was intended to avoid the crackdown by the investigative agency by installing the scenarios (CCTV) and the iron straw, etc., the crime of this case is not proper. Even if the police investigation was conducted as a result of the crime of this case, the situation where the location was unknown for a considerable period of time was caused by the crime of this case, and all other sentencing conditions such as Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, circumstances of the crime of this case, and the circumstances before and after the crime are considered unfair.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.