logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.02.21 2017고정1498
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1 million.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[former Fact-finding] Defendant A, after obtaining authorization from the head of Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on January 16, 2012, operated a child-care center in the name of “E” in the Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C Apartment D, and on May 1, 2015, Defendant A transferred to Seoul Gangdong-gu F G and took overall charge of the overall operation of childcare centers, including preparation and management of childcare center site, teachers, appointment and dismissal, support management, and demand for subsidies. Around June 2014, Defendant A was designated as a child-care center (19:30 to 21:30 minutes) and provided services for extension of hours from July 20 of the same year.

Defendant

B is a person who works as a long-term childcare teacher from around March 2, 2016 to around 16:30 to 22:30 minutes, and from around July 2016 to from around 15:30 to 21:30 minutes, at the above child care center where Defendant A, as her husband’s director, is a child care teacher.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The sole criminal conduct of Defendant A;

A. On July 31, 2014, the Defendant forged a private document forgery without authority for the purpose of exercising subsidies for extended childcare. The Defendant, without authority, stated the name and signature of H’s mother-child I in the “written confirmation of extended childcare hours for each child” column of H’s “written confirmation of childcare by each child,” from that time until February 29, 2016, stating the name and signature of the parents of the child who were taken care of at the above childcare center from that time to February 29, 2016, and forged the “written confirmation of extended childcare hours for each child”, which is a private document concerning the certification. (b) The Defendant, as stated in the foregoing investigation document, submitted the written confirmation of the extension of childcare hours by each child, from that time on July 31, 2014 to that time, from that time, until February 21, 200-2, 206, as well as from that time, from that time on February 29, 2014.

The monthly extension of childcare time for each child, such as the entry in the port.

arrow