Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a holder of EXE passenger car. The Defendant is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle owned by the Defendant, which is not covered by the automobile mandatory insurance from March 5, 2009 to March 17, 2011, from April 17, 2011 to January 17, 2013. However, the Defendant is not operating a motor vehicle in his/her possession on October 11, 2010 at regular 1:46, Gangnam-dong dong-dong dong-dong dong-dong dong-dong dong-dong dong-dong dong-dong dong-dong dong-si around 1:46, on November 25, 2012, at around 21:29, the Gangseo-do-ro (Yeung, Geumsan-ri 56, Do-ri 56, e.g., from the e., the e., the e., e., the e., the vehicle.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Compacting the non-insurance running cars;

1. Mandatory insurance contract history;

1. Compulsory insurance contract;

1. Application of the motor vehicle register perusal Act

1. Relevant Act on the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation (amended by Act No. 11369, Feb. 22, 2012); Article 46(2) and the main sentence of Article 8 (the main sentence) of the same Act (amended by Act No. 11369, Oct. 11, 2010); Article 46(2)2 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, and the main sentence of Article 8 (the main sentence) (the main sentence of Article 46(2)2 of the same Act on the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (the operation of vehicles which are not mandatory insurance and the choice of fines)

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing grounds of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order is the first offender for sentencing, the error is deeply divided, the circumstances leading to the operation of a vehicle which has not subscribed to mandatory insurance, the current difficult economic circumstances, and other conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, circumstances of the crime, means and result, and the circumstances before and after the crime.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.