logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.1.9.선고 2019노1632 판결
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
Cases

2019No1632 Violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (a place of public gathering)

Indecent Acts in this section)

Cr. Defendant

A

Appellant

Defendant

Prosecutor

The Acknific number of soldiers, stuffed video;

The judgment below

Seoul Central District Court Decision 2019DaMa6 decided May 15, 2019

Imposition of Judgment

January 9, 2020

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the grounds for appeal;

The Defendant did not commit the same crime as the facts charged.

2. Determination

The Defendant also asserted the same content in the lower court, and the lower court rejected its assertion on the same grounds as stated in the part of the “judgment on the Defendant’s and his defense counsel’s assertion” in the judgment. In light of the fact-finding and the record, the lower court’s finding of guilty of the facts charged in this case is just and acceptable, and there is no illegality that affected the conclusion of the judgment by misunderstanding the facts therefrom, and there is no illegality that affected the conclusion of the judgment (it cannot be deemed that the victim consented to the physical contact only with the fact, even if the victim did not have any response such as expressing the Defendant’s

3. Conclusion

The defendant's appeal is dismissed for lack of reason.

Judges

Newly appointed judges of the presiding judge;

Judge Lee Young-young

Judges Kim Dong-dong

arrow