1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. Status of the parties 1) Plaintiff A Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff A”).

The purpose of the maritime equipment leasing business is Plaintiff B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff B”).

) The purpose is to manufacture shipbuilding machinery, equipment and industrial machinery, etc., and Plaintiff C Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff C”).

On May 31, 2011, K Group changed its trade name to M Co., Ltd.

“L” without being classified below.

(2) Defendant D is an internal director from March 31, 2010 to May 16, 2010 to March 29, 2010, and Defendant C is an outside director from May 17, 2010 to March 29, 201, and Defendant C is an outside director from May 17, 201 to March 201, 201, and Defendant C is an outside director from May 17, 2010 to March 29, 201, and Defendant C is an outside director from May 17, 2010 to May 16, 2010, and Defendant C is an outside director from May 17, 2010 to March 29, 201, to whom the Plaintiffs claimed for termination of the contract.

B. On December 7, 2009, L applied for a “corporate improvement program” to the Korea Development Bank and applied for a “corporate improvement program.” 2) The Korea Development Bank entered into a business management agreement with creditor financial institutions, including L and the Korea Development Bank, to the effect that the creditor financial institutions, including the Korea Development Bank, are in charge of L’s business management, finance, funds, personnel management, etc., but the “management management group” composed of the employees dispatched by the creditor financial institutions, including the Korea Development Bank, entered into an agreement to implement the business normalization plan around April 30, 2010.

The above arrangement shall be in the above business administration agreement.