Text
1. The plaintiff B's lawsuit of this case and the creditor subrogation of the plaintiff A corporation.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) The D Group was changed from May 31, 201 to F.
hereinafter referred to as “E”
(2) The name of the company which omitted the corporation, the plaintiff company, G corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "corporation name").
(2) The Plaintiff Company is a member company of the D Group, which is engaged in the manufacture and sale of rolling stock, the assembly of machinery, equipment, equipment, and industrial machinery, etc. for shipbuilding, and E is a member company of the D Group, and the Defendant is a member company of the D Group engaged in the construction and sale of vessels, the repair of vessels, the repair of vessels, and the repair of repair business.
B. On December 8, 2009, E filed an application for a "corporate improvement program" with the Korea Development Bank on the ground that "the liquidity crisis occurred due to the difficulties in raising new funds due to the prosecutor's investigation by the prosecutor's office in the time of the Plaintiff B and its type E, which had overall control over its affiliates, such as the depression of the shipbuilding industry due to the global financial crisis, the cancellation of the contract due to the delay in delivery of ships, the increase in the cost of shipbuilding, and the creation of funds for the representative director P at the time of the Plaintiff B and its type E, and the Korea Development Bank applied for the "corporate improvement program" with the Financial Supervisory Service on December 18, 2009 (No. 7 and 60 evidence A) on the ground that the former Corporate Restructuring Promotion Act (amended by Act No. 8572 of Aug. 3, 2007; Act No. 9671, Apr. 1, 2009; hereinafter referred to as the "Council") was partly amended by Act No. 31010, etc.
On December 18, 2009, the Financial Supervisory Service shall not exceed the Korea Development Bank, the Korea Trade Insurance Corporation, and the Korea Bank.