logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.06.29 2017누42066
직접생산확인증명 취소처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows: (b) except for adding “(s) No. 45 of the judgment of the court of first instance,” “(s)” to the news report materials of the Public Procurement Service on January 2, 2016, stating that “the Plaintiff’s act of delivering products different from the standard of contract without prior approval of the demanding agency, etc.” is recognized as one of “the act of delivering products different from the standard of contract”; and (c) thus, it is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance court is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as there is no ground.

arrow