The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant: (a) provided education to the ordinary employee E to the customers seen as juveniles to undergo an identification card inspection; (b) provided due care and supervision to prevent the violation of E; and (c) made efforts to verify the juvenile status of four persons, such as Juvenile F, etc.

B. The sentence sentenced by the lower court to the Defendant (an amount of KRW 700,000) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The Defendant alleged that the lower court also exercised the duty of care and supervision over the Defendant’s assertion, and the lower court rejected the Defendant’s assertion on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, based on the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court and the reasoning of the lower court, which compared with the evidence duly admitted and examined by the lower court, the lower court’s aforementioned determination is justifiable. According to the evidence duly examined by the lower court, it can be acknowledged that the lower court did not take proper measures for confirmation of juvenile status before selling alcoholic beverages to juveniles, as stated in the facts charged of this case, and that there was an error of law by misunderstanding the facts and adversely affecting the conclusion

It does not seem that it does not appear.

B. Considering the circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, even in light of the circumstances asserted by the Defendant on the grounds of appeal.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.