logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.09.19 2019고단2426
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who has worked as a shop at the “D” store in Suwon-si, Suwon-si B.C.

1. Fraud;

A. On May 29, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim E, who visited the victim E to purchase a mobile phone at the above D point, concluded that “The victim E has a discount on the value of equipment available only for five months. At a discount of 20% from fixed price, Samsung Ggal jus may purchase “S9 flus” at a discount of 20%. When paying the value of the device in lump sum, the Defendant would open the mobile phone at a discounted price.”

However, in fact, the Defendant planned to use the mobile phone price that was temporarily received from the victim as his own gambling fund, and the head office was expected to make the victim purchase the mobile phone by deeming the victim to purchase the mobile phone at his own seat, and thus there was no intention or ability to make the victim process the mobile phone price in full.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received 862,400 won from the victim's bank account (Account Number:F) in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

B. Around July 3, 2018, the Defendant committed a crime against the Victim G with the victim G, who received a stolen article after the purchase of a mobile phone at the above D point, saying, “The Defendant purchased the mobile phone at a discount from the past. There is a way to receive a refund of the discounted amount even at present, but the Defendant may receive a refund as well as a discount if he/she cancels the payment of the discounted amount by lump sum payment of the mobile phone. The Defendant would pay KRW 1,378,00 as a refund on the face of the mobile phone amount of KRW 957,00.”

However, there was no system that makes a refund by discounting the mobile phone price already purchased, and the defendant has received the mobile phone price temporarily from the victim.

arrow