logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2017.12.01 2017나31683
청구이의
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as follows, and the reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the rejection of "the part after the completion of 2.2."

2. The part to be mard;

A. In light of the above legal principles, “No evidence to acknowledge otherwise exists as to the instant case in light of the foregoing,” (as to the foregoing, No. 41 of the first instance judgment), the Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff borrowed KRW 60 million from the Defendant to pay to the lessor the increased amount of KRW 60 million on the No. notarial deed. However, in light of the above legal principles, the lessor drafted a lease contract to increase KRW 60 million with the Plaintiff on March 8, 201, but it is difficult to acknowledge that the Plaintiff again drafted a monthly rent contract to pay KRW 420,000,000 to the Plaintiff on KRW 60,000,000,000 from the No. 1 of the No. 31 of the No. 3 of the No. 5 of the No. 3 of the No. 5 of the No. 5 of the No. 5,000,0000,000 paid to the Plaintiff on the No. 1 of the No. 61 of the No. 3 of the No.31 of the notarial deed.

Therefore, the notarial deed of this case is subsequent thereto.

arrow