1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B’s KRW 25,622,106 as well as 5% per annum from August 5, 2015 to November 11, 2016.

1. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B

A. The following facts are deemed to have been led by Defendant B pursuant to Article 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act:

At around 11:00 on August 4, 2015, Defendant B had the Plaintiff’s house connected liquefied propane gas and gas bags with chloudyl chloride.

At this time, Defendant B collected saltyl chlorideyl chloride in the above work, cut it back, cut it, and completed connection work with it.

원고는 2015. 8. 5. 05:00~06:00 사이에 가스 밸브를 열고, 가스레인지의 점화 스위치를 켠 순간 위와 같이 찢어진 염화비닐 호스에서 새어 나온 가스가 폭발하였다

(hereinafter “instant accident.” The Plaintiff suffered from the injury of images, etc. of 2 degrees in her butane and her butane, etc. due to the said gas explosion accident, and the Plaintiff suffered damages equivalent to KRW 25,62,106 in total of the lost import damages, sheras treatment expenses, future treatment expenses, and consolation money.

B. According to the above findings of determination, it is reasonable to view that Defendant B violated the ordinary duty of care necessary for gas supply connection work as follows: (a) the above heading was teared in the process of connecting chinyl chlorideyl chlorides; and (b) the failure to inspect gas leakage after the connection work was conducted.

In addition, the accident of this case seems to have occurred as a direct result of Defendant B’s breach of the above duty of care, and there is no counter-proof otherwise.

Therefore, Defendant B’s compensation for damages arising from the above tort, which is KRW 25,622,106, which is the amount of damages suffered by the Plaintiff as a result of the accident in this case, and the promotion of the lawsuit from August 5, 2015, to November 11, 2016, where the duplicate of the application form for modification of the purport of the claim in this case and the cause of the claim in this case, is obviously a delivery to the above Defendant.