Defendant

A The two-year imprisonment is for each of the crimes of heading 510 of order 2016 and heading 3106 of order 2016.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On December 12, 2014, A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for violating the Trademark Act at the Busan District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 21, 2015.

On July 13, 2016, Defendant B was sentenced to two years of suspension of the execution of four months of embezzlement by the Seoul Southern District Court on July 21, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 21, 2016.

1. Defendant A’s actual operator’s interest, and actual operator of H Co., Ltd. from March 25, 2014 to May 12, 2014, the Defendant did not have any economic situation, such as receiving a summary order of KRW 700,00 as a violation of the Labor Standards Act, by failing to pay KRW 1,455,82 to workers I retired while serving as the manager of H’s division from March 25, 2014.

A. On February 12, 2014, the Defendant: (a) concluded a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant, through B, imported 33,956,000 U.S. (an amount equivalent to KRW 433,956,00,000) a 30,000 U.S. package of brand brand brand brand scaf 4,000” to the victim F through B; (b) concluded a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant will complete customs clearance if the Defendant sent an advance payment of KRW 50,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won; and (c) concluded a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would import scaf 30,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000).”

However, in the issuance of a letter of credit through J, the defendant was a condition that J would issue a letter of credit having the effect of receiving the full amount of the import payment from the defendant, but the defendant will pay the full amount of the import payment.