Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for three years, and for one year, for Defendant B.

However, this judgment is delivered against Defendant B.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendants conspired to divide money with the victim E as the fee for issuing the guaranteed letter of credit, and Defendant B, around April 2014, would allow the victim to use KRW 4 billion at a discount within 14 days after the issuance of the guaranteed letter of credit if the victim paid USD 200,000 to the victim in the office of the KF building in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

If a letter of credit is not issued, all money received shall be refunded.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the Defendants intended to use most of the money received from the injured party for personal purposes, and there was no intention or ability to return the money received from the injured party even if the guaranteed letter of credit was not issued because there was no particular asset or income.

The Defendants received 206,240,000 won from the injured party as the fee on May 2, 2014 from the Defendant’s bank account (H) in the name of the Defendant.

2. On January 29, 2016, Defendant A, as the Seoul Gangnam-gu bankruptcy, would allow the victim I to use KRW 2.6 billion at a discount after the issuance of a credit, if he/she pays USD 300,000 to the victim I in the VIP room at a new bank, Dong financial center, 221, Dongnam-gu, Seoul, Seoul, for bankruptcy.

If a letter of credit is not issued, all money received shall be refunded.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the defendant tried to use the balance of real estate purchased by the defendant for personal purposes, such as the payment of the balance of real estate purchased by the victim, and there was no intention or ability to return money received from the victim even if the guaranteed letter of credit is not issued because there was no particular

On January 29, 2016, the Defendant was delivered KRW 366,000,000 to the account of the foreign exchange bank in the name of the Defendant (J) under the pretext of fees from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ each.