The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The Defendant was operating a mobile phone agency with the trade name of “C”, and is related to D and the establishment of a high school. A.

On February 4, 2015, the Defendant, in collusion with D on February 4, 2015, entered “C” U U.S., located in Gwangjin-si, in contact with D, without F’s consent, into “F” and “G” in the column for subscription to the LG U electronic data, and entered “F” and “F” in the column for automatic transfer of money, and entered “F” in the column for automatic transfer of money, and signed on the next page with D. The Defendant and D entered “F” in the name of another Party FG U U.S., an electronic record of rights and obligations or certification of facts for the purpose of handling administrative affairs as above, and entered “D” in the “CG U.S.,” without consent from the Defendant and the buyer at the location of “H.” and then entered the “H U.H.,” in collusion with the Defendant and the Defendant’s signature on February 7, 2015.

The Defendant and D forged an application form in the name of HG U, which is an electronic record of another person’s rights and duties or certification of facts, for the purpose of hindering the management of affairs as above.

B. The Defendant and D, respectively, stored and exercised the electronic records recorded in the form of “A” on LG U computer.

C. In collusion with D, the Defendant opened one cellphone 6 PLUS Handphone in F’s name, as the Defendant would normally pay the victim LG U, Inc., in collusion with D, as the Defendant would normally pay the victim’s LG U., the Defendant opened one cellphone 60,000 won.

However, it is true.