The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

The punishment sentenced by the court below (one year and six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

If there is no change in the conditions of sentencing compared to the original judgment in the appellate court, and the sentencing of the original court is not beyond the scope of reasonable discretion, it is reasonable to respect

(See Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260 Decided July 23, 2015, etc.). The following are the circumstances favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant appears to have committed a crime and committed a mistake; (b) the social relationship appears to be relatively good; (c) there is a mother to support; and (d) the fact that a traffic accident that was caused by May 2018 appears to be not good due to the health situation of the Defendant.

However, in light of the fact that the amount of penphones and marijuana handled by the defendant for each of the crimes of this case is not large, and the defendant has been punished for the same crime several times. On January 12, 2016, each of the crimes of this case has been committed repeatedly during the repeated crime period even after the execution of the sentence was completed, and other various sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, considering the factors of sentencing favorable to the defendant, the sentence against the defendant cannot be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, even if considering the factors of sentencing favorable to the defendant, and there is no significant change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is difficult to accept.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed on the ground that it is without merit.