A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in the “D” restaurant business located in Heak-gu Seoul Metropolitan City.

No one shall sell or provide alcoholic beverages that are drugs harmful to juveniles to juveniles.

Nevertheless, at around 20:30 on August 13, 2012, the Defendant prepared and sold 24,000 won per three Jeju Electronics and Kimchi at the same time, including two 6,00 won per two 1,00 won per one of three Jeju Electronics and Kimchi at the same time, without verifying identification cards to juvenile E (15 years of age, leisure), F (15 years of age, leisure), G (16 years of age, leisure), G (16 years of age, leisure).

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, G, H, and I;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning G and F;

1. Each self-statement in E, F and G preparation;

1. A certificate of a person;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs on control;

1. Article 51 Subparag. 8 of the Juvenile Protection Act and Article 26 (1) of the former Juvenile Protection Act (amended by Act No. 11048, Sept. 15, 201);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. At the time of the assertion, the Defendant’s wife, who was employed by the employee, confirmed his/her identification card, and the said juvenile submitted his/her adult identification card.

2. In the police investigation process, the Defendant stated that he directly conducted a 93-year identification card for all juveniles, presented the 93-year identification card, and that the juveniles did not want to be admitted to a crime of unlawful uttering of official documents. However, in this court, the Defendant stated that he was aware of the fact that he did not have a restaurant at the time of the enforcement of the police investigation and that he was aware of his identification card after his police investigation process, and that he could not speak the truth during the police investigation process, and that he could not be able to understand it without any consistency, and that the juveniles were young at the time of consistently from the police to this court.