beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[criminal power] On September 19, 201, the Defendant was subject to a disposition by the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office on charges of fraud on November 21, 201 with respect to the act of transferring the means of access under the Defendant's name for the purpose of lending, and was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment on the act of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. On December 8, 2011, the Defendant was subject to a disposition of suspension of indictment on the act of transferring the means of access under the Defendant's name at the Seoul Southern District Prosecutors' Office on March 22, 2012, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 10 on April 13, 201 with respect to the act of transferring the means of access under the Defendant's name on April 25, 2012. The Defendant was sentenced to a disposition of false accusation at the Suwon District Prosecutors' Office on July 25, 2012, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 10 on December 21, 2012.
【Criminal Facts】
On August 1, 2018, the Defendant received a communication from the personnel operating singishing operations on his name and insing insing insing insing insing insing insing insing insings to extend the details of transactions of withdrawals insing insing insing insings and lending. Our money will be deposited and delivered to our employees.”
However, as above, the Defendant: (a) was placed in several occasions on account of the violation of fraud and the Electronic Financial Transactions Act; (b) was subject to a disposition of incompeting fraud; (c) was subject to suspended indictment and criminal punishment for the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act; (d) was aware of the fact that the account he provided for the purpose of the loan was used in the course of the said investigation; (c) was not verified as to whether the lending company’s name and the lending company actually existed; and (d) was not prepared at all, the Defendant’s account provided by the lending company may be used in the phishing crime.
Nevertheless, there is a need to do so.