A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power, Investigation Experience, and Crime-Related Person] On May 29, 2015, the Defendant transferred the means of access in the name of the Defendant with respect to electronic financial transactions at the Jeonju District Court on May 29, 2015, and was sentenced to a fine of one million won due to the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in a case where the means of access was abused for telephone financial fraud (hereinafter “scam”).

On April 28, 2015, the Defendant had been sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in a case where the means of access was abused for “Sing” by transferring the means of access under the name of the Defendant with respect to electronic financial transactions at the Jeonju District Court.

On March 25, 2015, the Defendant transferred the means of access under the name of the Defendant regarding electronic financial transactions at the former District Prosecutors' Office on March 25, 2015, and was charged with the violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act in cases where the means of access was abused for singing.

On March 3, 2015, the Defendant was investigated on March 3, 2015, in a case where the cash card linked to the Defendant’s account in the original district public prosecutor’s office was transferred to an unqualified person, and the means of access was abused for “singing”, and was investigated as a crime of fraud using computers, etc. (it does not constitute a crime of violating the Electronic Financial Transactions Act), but was subject to a disposition of being suspected of being suspected of having been committed as an accomplice due to lack of evidence.

On September 3, 2014, in a case where the former District Public Prosecutor’s Office transferred a means of access linked to the Defendant’s account to an unspecified person on September 3, 2014, and the means of access was abused for “Sing”, there was no provision punishing a lending without legal consideration at the time of the act, and thus, the Defendant was subject to a disposition of incompetence (defluence of evidence) due to lack of evidence to impeachment a suspect’

On March 13, 2012, the Defendant transferred a means of access linked to the Defendant’s account at the Seoul Northern District Prosecutors’ Office to an insulare on March 13, 2012.