beta
Text
1.(a)
Plaintiff
A, Defendant C, D, and Seoul Guarantee Insurance Co., Ltd., together, KRW 8,400,00 and this.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Defendant C is a real estate broker who operated G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office from June 21, 201 to September 9, 2013. Defendant D is a real estate broker who operated the I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office from Apr. 8, 2011 to Apr. 25, 2014. Defendant C is a real estate broker who operated the I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office from Seocheon-gu J, Seocheon-gu, U.S. and K Licensed Real Estate Agent Office from Aug. 11, 2006 to 110.
B. On October 8, 2012, Plaintiff A entered into an obligatory lease agreement with L to lease by setting the deposit amount of KRW 50,000,000, and the term of lease from October 31, 2012 to October 30, 2014 (hereinafter “first lease agreement”) without rent of KRW 501,000,000, and the contract for lease between Defendant C and D.
C. On July 27, 2013, Plaintiff B entered into an obligatory lease agreement between L and L with the broker of Defendant C and E to lease the instant building by setting the deposit of KRW 45,000,000 and the term of lease from August 5, 2013 to August 4, 2014 (hereinafter “second lease agreement”); the said agreement is referred to as “second lease agreement”; the said agreement is referred to as “second lease agreement”; and the said agreement is referred to as “second lease agreement” as “second lease agreement.”
At the time of mediating a lease agreement, Defendant C and D stated the Plaintiff as a legitimate building on the building ledger in the description of confirmation and explanatory note of the object of brokerage at the time of arranging the lease agreement, and stated in the column of legal relationship of the description as “the maximum amount of debt 930,000,000 won on September 6, 201, and the National Federation of Federation of Collaterals,” respectively, as “no corresponding” in the column of matters concerning the right of the object that is not actually related or publicly notified. As such, Defendant C and E explain the same as at the time of the first lease agreement at the time of arranging the second lease agreement.