The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (the factual error) is that the Defendant actually received treatment by being hospitalized in Ewon and D Council members according to the doctor's prescription, and the judgment of the court below is erroneous in misunderstanding of facts.

2. The court below, based on the evidence duly adopted and examined, stated the following circumstances: ① at the time of the police investigation, N in the E in the case of an industrial accident or general inpatients other than the patient suffering from traffic accidents at the time of the investigation; ② around December 12, 2009 during the period of hospitalization at E in the Seoul Seocho-gu and around November 13, 2010, the Defendant’s physical card was used, and the Defendant’s physical card was used several times in the vicinity of Thai City during the period of hospitalization (in addition, the Defendant stated that he was not hospitalized at one time during the period of hospitalization). ③ At the time of 2010, G in the case of a false patient, which was treated as an ordinarily at the time of hospitalization at the time of 2010, the Defendant did not appear at the time of 20 days after 10 days after 20 days after 20 days after 20 days after 20 days after 20 days after 20 days after 20 days after 20 days after 20 days after 20 days after 20 days.

3. Thus, the defendant's appeal is without merit.