The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal by the defense counsel (the fact-finding) is as follows: (a) the Defendant was hospitalized to the instant hospital and actually received medical treatment upon the solicitation of a doctor who needs hospital treatment; and (b) the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the charges

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below, i.e., the defendant subscribed to 18 types of insurance products in the absence of a special occupation, in particular, nine insurance products in the year 2009, and ii) the head of the nursing department of the instant hospital was the first hospital at the investigative agency, and i.e., the instant hospital was the first hospital at the investigative agency.

As such, the anonymous witness, who was employed at the instant hospital, stated that he was hospitalized as if he actually hospitalized in order to induce the patient. The investigative agency stated that the director, etc. of the instant hospital, etc., took care of the patient, focusing on the person subscribed to an insurance policy for actual expenses, and, at the same time, he actually took care of the patient and made the patient prepare a false prescription instruction paper, nursing record paper, etc. as if he was hospitalized. In light of this, the instant hospital appears to have been able to have been able to provide the most false hospitalized treatment. ③ The Defendant, upon being hospitalized at the instant hospital around 2010, was able to have a good machinery at the time when he was hospitalized at the instant hospital, was hospitalized at the instant hospital along with L at a similar time. ④ The Defendant appears to have been subject to a fine for fraud. ④ The Defendant appears to have been hospitalized at a point other than the instant hospital in the currency of 26 times in the currency of the Defendant, ⑤ The Defendant’s average number of patients prepared for the instant hospital’s meal, but 2.