1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

In full view of Gap evidence Nos. 2 and Eul evidence Nos. 2 and the purport of the entire pleadings, it is recognized that the original copy of the payment order for the purchase price case No. 2010, 140852 (hereinafter "the instant payment order") was not served for three times from "Seoul Special Metropolitan City D-101, where the defendant's domicile is the defendant's domicile, to have no closed door door, and that the defendant received the original copy of the instant payment order directly from the special office of Seoul Special Metropolitan City Gwanak-gu Office around October 26, 2010, and that the defendant raised an objection against the instant payment order on January 4, 2017.

According to the above facts, the original copy of the instant payment order was delivered to the Defendant on October 26, 2010, and the lawsuit of this case became final and conclusive on November 10, 2010 after two weeks passed thereafter, and it was terminated. The Defendant’s objection filed on January 4, 2017 was filed after the lapse of the period for filing an objection without justifiable grounds, and thus is unlawful.

(4) The defendant's appeal is dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices. (4) The defendant's appeal is dismissed. (5) It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.