A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] The Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with labor for a crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Changwon District Court’s branch on May 20, 2016, and was sentenced to two years of suspended execution on May 28, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on May 28, 2016, and is currently under suspended execution.

[Criminal facts] On April 5, 2016, the Defendant was found to have received 0.05g male from E in the alley path following the D Hospital located in Sung-gun, Jinnam-gun, D on April 5, 2016

On April 15, 2016, the Defendant stated, at the time of the prosecutor’s investigation, that “after G hospital located in Gosung-gun F on April 5, 2016 from 23:0 to 24:00, the Defendant was subject to 0.05 g philopon from E to E,” and thereafter, the Defendant was indicted on April 21, 2016 for a crime of violation of the Narcotics Control Act (fence) and became final and conclusive on May 28, 2016, upon being sentenced to a suspended sentence of imprisonment for one year in the above court, on the one-year period of imprisonment for the said court, and on May 28, 2016.

Afterward, E was charged with a violation of the Narcotics Control Act on July 6, 2016, and was detained in the Changwon District Court’s Tong-won District Court’s 2016 order 878, and was tried on the sole basis of criminal law No. 1.

around 15:00 on August 31, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the above judgment opened in the court No. 207 of the Changwon District Court 207, Changwon District Court 67, a path to the 30th day inside the month, Yong-do.

In the examination of the above case, the defendant purchased 220,000 won from the defendant on April 5, 2016 the witness of the prosecutor's "the witness" from the defendant on April 5, 2016.

I cannot answer the question "..."

“The witness at the time of the prosecutor’s investigation,” and the prosecutor’s “the witness at the time of the prosecutor’s investigation,” has purchased the Mepta from the Defendant

Not stated Naba

“At that time, we fit the question “,” and speaks that there is no spirit.

H The same is that the grix fit for the defendant, and H refers to the defendant.

It is essential for the prosecutor to answer "," and for the witness ", April 5, 2016, the witness sent 220,000 won after receiving the account number from the defendant in writing, such as a photograph.