logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.01.23 2016고단42
폭행
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On May 30, 2015, the Defendant served as a life instruction physician at the “D Rehabilitation Institute”, and assaulted the victim F (35 years) face of the victim F (35 years), who is a mentally disabled person, from the “Bullle” ward located in Gwangju-si around 20:0 on May 30, 2015, to his/her hand floor at the “Bule” ward located in the D Rehabilitation Institute, the third floor of the D Rehabilitation Institute.

2. Determination

(a) Evidence that there is a criminal fact in a criminal procedure shall be presented by a prosecutor, and it shall be the same as the criminal defendant's malpractice is unreasonable and false;

Even if there is no evidence to establish such a degree of conviction, it is inevitable to judge the interests of the defendant even if there is suspicion of guilt against the defendant (see Supreme Court Decision 2007Do163, Nov. 30, 2007, etc.).B. In addition, evidence corresponding to the facts of this case conform to the facts of this case as evidence, the witness G's testimony that directly witness the same assault as stated in the facts of this case and the victim's face was being caught separately from the defendant, and there is H's testimony that H's testimony that the victim's face remains. The victim F is unable to express his normal expression or delivery due to mental disability 1; ultimately, the victim's testimony or communication was made impossible, and witness's testimony was made only in the case of the victim and D.

However, in light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this court, each testimony of the above witness alone is insufficient to acknowledge the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

(1) A witness I shall be accompanied by J in this Court.

arrow