1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H jointly do and do so from June 12, 2013.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H (hereinafter the above Defendants collectively referred to as “Defendant A, etc.”) were indicted for violating the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud), and both the first instance court and the appellate court have been convicted, and on December 24, 2014, the judgment of the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the Supreme Court on December 24, 2014, determined that Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment for seven years and fines for five hundred million won; Defendant B shall be sentenced to imprisonment for two years and six years, and fines for two years and five hundred million won; Defendant C shall be sentenced to imprisonment for twelve years, and KRW 1.5 billion; Defendant A shall be sentenced to imprisonment for six years and a fine for one billion; Defendant G shall be sentenced to imprisonment for ten years and a fine for one billion won; Defendant H and a fine for one billion won; and Defendant H and a fine for two billion won.

[Judgment of the court of first instance, Suwon District Court Decision 2013Gohap490, 2013Gohap525, 2013Gohap525 (combined), 2013Gohap542 (Consolidated), 2013Gohap587 (Consolidated), Seoul High Court Decision 2014No475, 1292 (Consolidated) decided July 25, 2014; Supreme Court Decision 2014Do10870 Decided December 24, 2014] The contents related to the instant case among the criminal facts of the above final judgment are as follows.

1. Public invitation relationship between the defendant A, etc.;

A. Defendant C: (a) included bank employees and deducted blank checks that can include 100 million won or more; (b) paid fees to the bond company to issue the original cashier’s checks with the check number and copy of the original checks; and (c) forged the so-called “dunes round checks” in the manner of stating in the above blank checks by securing the check number and copy of the original checks; and (d) planned to commit the crime of defrauding money by presenting them to the bank.

B. From the end of December 2012, Defendant C received 20% of the check amount from Defendant C, the vice head of a national bank L branch in collusion with Defendant C to deduct the blank check amount and to provide loan guarantee for the preparation of the cost of the work of using the blank check in collusion with Defendant C.

(c).