(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.06 2015나22136

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.06 2015나22136

소유권이전등기

Text

1. All appeals filed by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) against the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The appeal costs.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The plaintiffs (appointed parties) and appointed parties (hereinafter collectively referred to as the plaintiffs

) 97 persons, including Defendant C, F, and Defendant G, H, and I, are 13 Defendants (hereinafter referred to as Defendant C, F, G, H, and I as the Defendants, and the said 13 persons as Defendant, etc.

(2) On November 14, 2006, the court rendered a favorable judgment against the Defendant, etc. to the effect that on November 14, 2006, the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer based on the acquisition by prescription should be fulfilled.

3) The Defendant, etc. appealed by Seoul High Court No. 2007Na13093, but was sentenced to the dismissal of appeal on March 21, 2008, and the judgment became final and conclusive (hereinafter “the final and conclusive judgment of this case”).

4) Meanwhile, the final and conclusive judgment of this case contains the purport of this case.

B. 1) On August 20, 2010, K filed an objection to the instant final judgment with the title of execution against the Seoul Central District Court’s receipt of the Seoul Central District Court registration office, No. 28857, Dec. 22, 2003, on the ground that the foregoing registry office’s registration office was dismissed on September 3, 2010 on the ground that the address indicated in the final judgment of the Defendant C, F, and LJ and the identity cannot be recognized because the address indicated in the instant final judgment of the Defendant C, F, and L are not the same as the address indicated in the closed register of the instant real estate, and thus, K filed an objection to the disposition of the competent registry office as the court’s 2010 did not dismiss it.

3 The Appointed filed an appeal with the court No. 2011Ra120, and some other Defendants of the final and conclusive judgment of this case were accepted. However, the application for registration with respect to the Defendants of this case was not accepted.

C. On the other hand, while continuing the trial.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2015.03.06 2012가단111577

-서울중앙지방법원 2015. 11. 6. 선고 2015나22136 판결

-대법원 1981. 1. 13. 선고 80다204, 205 판결

-대전지방법원 2021.02.08 2019나120075

-전주지방법원 2015.10.30 2015가단15308