1. The Defendants, from among the real estate listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff, Defendant B 3/15 shares, and the remainder of the Defendants, respectively.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Nonparty I filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff seeking the implementation of the ownership transfer registration procedure based on the completion of prescriptive acquisition as to the real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant real estate”) with the Jeonju District Court 2006Da38569, and the decision in lieu of the conciliation on March 26, 2009 became final and conclusive from the appellate court (the Jeonju District Court 2008Na6185).

B. Its content is that the Plaintiff received KRW 7 million from the above I, at the same time, conducted the procedure for ownership transfer registration for the instant real estate to the above I on October 22, 2003 due to the completion of the prescriptive acquisition on October 22, 2003, and the above I would pay KRW 7 million to the Plaintiff simultaneously with the execution of the procedure for ownership transfer registration for the instant real estate by the Plaintiff.

C. The above I died on June 28, 2009, and the defendant B is the spouse of the above I, and the remaining defendants are the children of the above I.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendants, the successors of the above I, are obligated to take over the registration procedure for ownership transfer on October 22, 2003 as to the 3/15 shares in the real estate listed in the separate sheet from the Plaintiff, and the remaining Defendants, as to the 2/15 shares in each of the 2/15 shares, respectively.

I would like to say.

3. In conclusion, each of the instant claims against the Defendants against the Plaintiff is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all.