logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.04.04 2012고단7000
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In fact, the defendant did not have the ability to establish a driving school due to the economic situation, and even if he received the order of the victim from the victim, there was no idea to use it to establish and operate a driving school, and there was no intention or ability to pay money to the victim.

1. On May 15, 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim that “D” operated by the victim C in Gwangju-dong-gu, Gwangju-gu, stating that “I would create one bottle, and will bring 1.5 million won to the victim by the end of May 2012.” The Defendant received from the victim a delivery of 1.5 million U.S. dollars equivalent to the market price on behalf of the victim C.

2. On May 16, 2012, the Defendant issued three points of the victim’s forest equivalent to KRW 4.5 million at the market price, on the following grounds: (a) the victim made a false statement to the effect that “the victim will pay KRW 4.5 million by the end of May 2012, 201,” stating that “The Defendant will pay KRW 30,500,000 of the E’s acid.”

3. On May 17, 2012, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the victim that “I will give KRW 2 million by the end of May 2012, 201,” stating that “I will give KRW 1/2 of F1 and KRW 1/2 of G1/2 to the victim; and (b) received two copies of the forest equivalent to KRW 2 million at the market price from the victim.”

4. On May 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the victim that “Franc will pay the price for the franc to the victim by the end of May 2012, 2012”; and (b) received from the victim the payment of one picture equivalent to KRW 3.5 million at the market price.”

5. On May 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) made a false statement to the victim that “The Defendant would pay the price for the Scholimon by the end of May 2012, 2012,” and received from the victim one point of picture equivalent to KRW 500,000,000 at the market price.”

As a result, the Defendant received the forest equivalent to KRW 12 million in total market price from the victim and did not pay the price, thereby acquiring property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police in relation to C.

arrow