Text
1. Defendant D and Defendant Chungcheongbuk-do jointly share KRW 5,323,400, and KRW 500,000, respectively, to Plaintiff B and Plaintiff C.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
At around 20:10 on September 22, 2016, Defendant D (Supervision of Camp-gu) collected part of the camping-gu, including the Plaintiff, from a G Training Institute, a training center for the camping-gu, a F School on the ground that some members of the camping-gu, including the Plaintiff, were late to provide meals and left in a large voice, making the head booms on the floor over two occasions, having the Plaintiff take a bath, and booms the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff’s booms the part on the part of the Plaintiff, and walking the part on the part of the Plaintiff, the head of the Plaintiff’s hair can be cut back to the back, and the Plaintiff’s hair end to the end to the Plaintiff’s chest, and the Plaintiff’s chest end to the Plaintiff’s chest, and the Plaintiff’s chest end to the Plaintiff’s chest, and the Plaintiff’s chest end to the Plaintiff’s chest, and the Plaintiff’s chest end to the end to the Plaintiff’s hair.
As a result, Defendant D inflicted bodily injury on Plaintiff A, such as the impairment of 2 feet, scambry, etc., which requires approximately 20 days of treatment.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). Defendant D is above-mentioned.
On December 19, 2017, the Cheongju District Court (2017dan471) was sentenced to a fine of 5,00,000 won due to the facts constituting the crime described in the paragraph, and both the prosecutor and the Defendant D appealed, and the appeal is pending at the present appellate court (Cheongju District Court 2018No2).
Plaintiff
B The father of the Plaintiff A and the mother of the Plaintiff C.
Defendant E is the principal of F School, Defendant Chungcheongbuk-do is a local government that establishes and operates F School.
[Ground of recognition] According to the facts of recognition as to the claim against the defendant D and the defendant Chungcheongbuk-do, the defendant D is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case as a tortfeasor who committed assault against the defendant A, who caused the harm.
As to this, the Defendants are against Defendant D.