1. The part as to Daedae L&C Co., Ltd., which is the taking-off of the lawsuit for the new construction of the defendant corporation at the first instance judgment.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: A. 4-12 of the judgment of the court of first instance is added to "the instant accident" (hereinafter "the instant accident"); A. 4-12 of the judgment of the court of first instance is changed to "A. 4-14, 25-34, and the court of first instance"; 4-19 of the judgment of the court of first instance is changed to "A. 4-14, 25-34 of the judgment of the court of first instance"; 2-19 of the judgment of the court of first instance is changed to "A. . . . . . . .. .. ... ... .... ... .... .... .... .... ..... ...... ..... ... see the part of the claim against Defendant 4

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiff suffered significant water leakage in the plaintiff's apartment building, which had failed to properly manage the drainage hole of the rooftop capacity attached to 1205 of the apartment building of this case. The defendant B and the defendant C (hereinafter "the defendant 1 and 2") were responsible as the possessor of the apartment of this case 1205, and the defendant Samong Building Co., Ltd. (hereinafter "the defendant 3"), as the owner of the apartment of this case 1205, did not recognize the negligence of the defendant 1 and 2, as the owner of the apartment of this case. The plaintiff bears strict liability as the owner of this case. <2, the defendant 1 and 1205, which is the litigation department for new construction of the apartment of this case ("the defendant 4."), constructed the height of the floor floor of the rooftop capacity of this case at a higher than 3cc meters than the indoor, and constructed the roof height of the apartment of this case at a low level after the 2nd of the 10th of the roof of this case.