1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. Indication of parties to the judgment of the first instance.

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following modifications or additions. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is acceptable as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(However, “Defendant A” at the bottom of the second judgment of the court of first instance, which was used or added on February 2, 200 (except for the part concerning Codefendant B, Ltd. which became separate and final, shall be construed as “Defendant A” at the bottom of the second judgment of the court of first instance as “Defendant A, a receiver of the debtor rehabilitation debtor A, a litigation taking over the lawsuit of the defendant A, a Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant A”).

The three pages of the decision of the first instance court shall be referred to as "the defendant A" and "the defendant A".

The following shall be added between 3 pages 6 and 7 of the first instance judgment:

A person shall be appointed.

D. Defendant A filed an application for rehabilitation with the Seoul Rehabilitation Court 2018 Joint3, and received a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures (trusteeD) on August 16, 2018. Upon receipt of a decision to authorize rehabilitation plans on March 6, 2019, Defendant A received a decision to terminate rehabilitation procedures on May 15, 2019.

7 pages 3 of the first instance court's decision, "the purport of the entire pleadings" has been changed to "this court's clear facts and the purport of the entire pleadings".

Since the 4th 11th 1th 1th 1th 1th 1th 1th 1st 1th 1st 2th 2th 201 is a benefit claim, it cannot be deemed that the nature of a benefit claim constitutes a public benefit claim pursuant to the above provision, and the seizure and collection order

3. As the judgment of the court of first instance is justified, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and each "Defendant A corporation" in the indication and order of the parties to the judgment of the court of first instance is obvious that it is a clerical error of "A, a receiver of the debtor debtor A, a receiver of the debtor debtor A, a lawsuit of the defendant corporation A, is a clerical error of "A," and it is so decided as per Disposition.