logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.05.22 2013고단347
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months and by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

Defendant 64 (No. 1) of seized Cor Seas.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From November 1, 201 to May 13, 201, Defendants in collusion with F and G to take charge of the overall management duties as Defendant B at H “IS treatment center” located in Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and Defendant A took charge of the role of the so-called “boom president” and being investigated at the time of the police control, and F and G took charge of the duties of customer guidance, thereby taking charge of the duties of sexual grandchildren’s 100,000 won and having sexual intercourse with K and sexual intercourse with the male grandchildren.

2. At around 14:00 on June 18, 2013, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the case of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, etc. to the above court No. 2013 high-level347 B located in Dobong-gu Seoul Northern District Court (Seoul Northern District Court Decision 401, Jun. 18, 2013, the Defendant stated that “When the witness is a regular manager of the Ianma procedure, he did not have any part in the L.”, “B had no part in the L. L.”, “B had no part in the Ianma procedure, and had no part in the operation of the Ianma procedure.”, “B did not seem to have been able to have been viewed as having sold cosmetics to A,” and “B should have referred to as cosmetics directly.”

However, in fact, the defendant was in charge of the regular business of the Ianma treatment place, which is a sexual traffic business place, and the defendant was merely in charge of the "Ianma treatment place" as the regular business of the Ianma treatment place, and the B was involved in the operation of the above business place as the actual business place with the husband L, and the defendant was in charge of the Kabter at night when the defendant was in charge of the regular business of the above business place, and there was no person in charge of selling

The Defendant above.

arrow