1. Of the first lower judgment, paragraphs 1 through 6, and 9-a:

(b) Consolidated, 10-A.

annexed list of crimes in the annexed list of crimes.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (i) The portion of the judgment of the court below in the first instance [the crimes listed in Section 7, 8, 9-B at the time of the market; (ii) the crimes listed in Section 1, 2, 10-A, 145, 275, 324, 11-A, 122, 263, 267, 11-B, 34, 34, 34-34-347, 11-C (hereinafter referred to as "each crime committed before the previous final judgment"), 6 months of imprisonment; (iii) the crimes listed in Section 1, 6, 9-2, 10-A; and (b) the attached Table 1 through 116, 10-2, 10-33, 14, 145-14, 15-14, 27-14, 15-14, 27

"Partials: 2 years of imprisonment, 3 months of imprisonment, 6 months of imprisonment, too unreasonable.

2. Of the judgment of the first instance court, the Defendant’s error in determining each part of the crimes committed before the previous final and conclusive judgment reflects the Defendant’s fault in depth, and there is a need to consider equity in cases where the Defendant was tried simultaneously with the confirmation of the first head as indicated in the judgment of the lower court.

However, considering the fact that the defendant had been punished several times due to the same crime, and again obtained credit cards in the name of X and W by fraudulent means, repeated the crime such as purchase of goods and withdrawal of cash, and did not meet the amount of damage and did not compensate the victims, the punishment for six months sentenced by the first instance court is appropriate.

3. Of the judgment of the court of first instance on ex officio determination, the part concerning each of the crimes after the previous final judgment and the Defendant’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing regarding each of the crimes in the judgment of second court is ex officio.