logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.04.28 2019나41890
부당이득금
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff corresponding to the subsequent order of payment shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation of this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following cases. Thus, the court's explanation of this case is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Grounds for the judgment of the court of first instance on the part used after filing the petition;

1.(a)

Note 1 7: “Time limit of delivery: December 20, 2014” was changed to December 20, 2014 after the signing of the contract on December 20, 2014.

"Flags".

Reasons for the judgment of the first instance court

1.(b)

- Paragraph 2 4 of this case hereinafter referred to as "each insurance contract of this case"

“B” (hereinafter referred to as “B) concerning the part concerning the 1 insurance contract and the Chungcheong Land Management Office, the part concerning the 2 insurance contract of this case is referred to as “the 2 insurance contract of this case”, and when referring in total, referring to each insurance contract of this case.

"Flags".

Reasons for the judgment of the first instance court

1.(c)

[2] Paragraph 6 of Article 6 of the Insurance Money was paid KRW 22,10,00,000, “The insurance money was paid KRW 22,100,000.” From April 28, 2016 to May 2, 2016, the Chungcheongnamju National Land Management Office, through the repair company, performed the “inspection and replacement of the part of the machinery equipment program of K” defect repair work, and paid KRW 22,00,000 to the repair company at that time, and the remainder of KRW 10,00 was returned to the Plaintiff.” At the fourth fourth of the judgment of the first instance court, the “No. 1 through 7” was provided with “No. 1 to 7,11,000, and the part of the insurance contract cannot be concluded as if the insured had been aware at the time of the first instance judgment’s insurance contract or the first instance judgment’s insurance contract was concluded as one of the parties to the insurance contract.

arrow