1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3.Paragraph 1 of the text of the judgment of the court of first instance.

The reasoning of the judgment of this court is set forth in Section 2-B of the first instance judgment.

Of the part of the judgment on the Defendant’s assertion, the Plaintiff asserts that “(3) even if the family contract has been terminated, the amount of KRW 35,000,000 shall also be returned along with the facility payment of KRW 160,000,000,000 other than the lease deposit (deficiencies),” and that “(3) even if the family contract has been terminated, the Plaintiff, on March 23, 2016, sent the content-certified mail to the Defendant and promised to return KRW 35,00,000,000 paid to the Plaintiff, and therefore, the Plaintiff has the obligation to return the above amount of KRW 35,00,000,000 as well as KRW 160,000,000,000,000 as well as KRW 35,000,000,000,000,000,000,000.”

(1) The judgment of the court of first instance is justified in finding and determining the facts of the court of first instance, considering the evidence submitted by the defendant to this court, and there is no error as alleged in the grounds for appeal by the defendant). The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is correct since the "part (a) and (b)" in paragraph (1) of the judgment of the court of first instance is obvious that it is a clerical error of "in-board (a) and (b) part (a) and (b) 56.16§³"