Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On May 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 15:05, at the fifth floor of “Del” operated by the Defendant’s female living together with the Defendant, at early early 15:05, on the ground that the Defendant’s 503 floor (503) was unable to leave, and on the ground that the Defendant’s 112 report was received from the Defendant, and the F of the police officer and the police officer G, belonging to the E zone in the Seocho Police Station E zone, were not to have the guests informed, the Defendant provided the said police officer “hingings. Shet, she will do so.” On the other hand, the Defendant provided the said F’s two faces, walking the faces of the Defendant, and walking the faces of the above G on one occasion at the same time, and, at the same time, obstructed the Defendant’s legitimate treatment of the victim, such as the victim’s injury to the public order and order at the same time, and obstructed the performance of his duties (hereinafter referred to as the victim’s 2).

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and G;

1. A photograph and video CD related to the obstruction of performance of official duties;

1. Two copies of a medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling Table;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act corresponding to the relevant criminal facts, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties)

1. The gist of the allegation was that the Defendant, at the police officer’s request, breathed a guest while drunk and then breath the guest’s glass, etc., and the police officer requested the police officer to arrest the guest.