1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The defendant's ground of appeal citing the judgment of the court of first instance is not significantly different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are recognized as legitimate even if the witness I of the court of first instance duly adopted and examined the evidence by the court of first instance.

The reasoning for the court's reasoning for this case is as follows: ① (b) and (d) parts of the judgment of the first instance are modified as stated in the following paragraph (2); (2) "70 million won" of the second 13th 2nd 13th 2nd 2nd 10,000 won [28 million won: within five days after the date of issuance of the tax invoice after the conclusion of the contract, intermediate payment: payment of 21 million won within five days after the date of issuance of the tax invoice, three months after the commencement of the business (1. 31 January 31, 2014): Payment of 20 million won after the date of issuance of the tax invoice; (3) additional payment of 30 million won at the end of the 2nd 19th 2nd 2nd 1,500,000 won [3rd 1,50,000 won]; and (4) second 2nd 15th 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 2nd 3rd 3rd 201.

2. Parts to be dried;

A. Article 3-2(b) of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance

In full view of the statements in Gap evidence 6 and Eul evidence 5 to 7, and in part of Eul evidence 9-1, the whole purport of the pleadings is as follows: ① around December 10, 2013, Eul became aware that N3 chips can be connected to "PC 2 householdx4, x8, and x16" through the plaintiff, and around that time, "PC 2x8" with the inside of the plaintiff and N3 chips.