A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 15:03, 2014, the Defendant, at a restaurant located in the five-day market in the old-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Jeonnam-gun, the Defendant: (a) stated that, in order to identify the personal information of the persons who were boomed, the police box affiliated with the same police box, the police box affiliated with the same police box, E, etc., “I ambling, I ambling, I ambling”; and (b) stated that “I ambling” was “I ambling, I ambling,” and assaulted E, who was arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult, by taking advantage of his son’s son’s son who was arrested as a flagrant offender in the crime of insult.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of the E, F, and G;

1. As to the report of investigation (as to the attachment of a photograph of damage)

1. Application of each statute to a photograph of damage;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (Consideration of the fact that the defendant is against the defendant and that there is no past record of punishment for the same crime);