logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.10.28 2014고단1271
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On March 3, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on March 3, 2008, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2 million for the same crime in the same court on April 8, 2013.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On May 14, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (Driving without a license) and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driving the C Poter Cargo in a section of about 4 km from the road front of the tercheon-gu printing board located in the 1strode underground of the Yannam-gun, in the state of alcohol of 0.063% of the blood alcohol concentration, and driving the C Poter Cargo in a section of about 4 km to the front of SamsungMM-si in the same military field of SamsungM-si, in the state of alcohol of 0.063%.

2. On May 14, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:30, the Defendant: (b) was found to have driven a motor vehicle of Samsung C, the Defendant owned by the Defendant, while driving his/her motor vehicle in front of Samsung C, which is the Defendant, and was required to present his/her driver’s license and make a statement of personal information from D, the circumstances leading to the traffic control division of the former Meal Police Station, when he/she was

The Defendant responded to the other police officers, who had been punished strictly due to drunk driving, as the Defendant’s resident registration number (F) as the Defendant’s resident registration number, and signed each “E” in the signature column of the “Notice of the Control of Drinking Driving Regulations” and “Report of the Statement of the Statement of the Detoxicing Drivers.”

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place mentioned in the above paragraph (2), issued a notice of the result of the influence of drinking driving and the report on the state of drinking drivers, stating the signature of the forged person, to D police officers in charge of crackdowning the forgery, and exercised it as if they were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Notification of the results of the control of drinking driving, and the report on the actual state of each drinking driver; and

arrow