A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, along with name-free loan business operators (one name C) and D (Lessor), used the loan for house leasing to ordinary people at the Korea Housing Finance Corporation without due diligence, and used the document screening only for the document screening. The Defendant, who carried out the loan business, committed the act of the lessee, and D, by preparing documents to obtain a loan by preparing a false lease contract for 110, Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, E-Do Do 110, and acquired the loan for house leasing from the financial institution.

Around August 19, 2011, at the G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F Commercial Building 102, the Defendant prepares a false lease agreement with the content of the lease agreement as if the Defendant rents KRW 280 million to KRW 110,000,000, and D receives KRW 28 million as the down payment from the Defendant around August 19, 201.

“The” prepares a false receipt of the content.

After that, around September 1, 2011, the Defendant submitted the aforementioned false real estate lease agreement, false receipts, and the above loan provider’s false employment certificate to H, who is an employee of the victim, at the victim Nonghyup-dong branch located in Yongsan-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu, 635-1.

However, the Defendant did not provide D with KRW 28 million worth worth 10% of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the loan. The Defendant did not have a plan to move into the deposit of the loan of the deposit of the loan of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the loan of the

Nevertheless, around September 6, 2011, the Defendant, as seen above, was informed of the victim’s deception and then received KRW 65 million from the victim’s bank account in D’s name.

Accordingly, the defendant is a house in collusion with a name-free lender or D.