logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.05 2015가단26042
손해배상(산)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share the amount of KRW 53,377,009 with respect to the Plaintiff and the period from July 24, 2014 to July 5, 2017.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. Fact 1) The Plaintiff, D, etc., on July 24, 2014, are Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”).

(A) The Defendant Company is employed in a solar-powered power plant located in the Mayang-gun E, Mayang-gun, with the solar power plant (hereinafter referred to as “the cell board”).

(2) At around 16:50 on the same day, the Plaintiff fells on the ground and fells on the top of the roof while conducting the installation work. As a result, the Plaintiff suffered bodily injury, such as the 1 and 3 pressure frame.

3) Defendant C directly instructed and supervised the above work as the representative director of the Defendant Company. B. The existence of liability for damages 1) The Plaintiff asserted by the parties, as the Plaintiff was involved in work in accordance with the Defendants’ instructions without receiving protective equipment, such as safety belts, etc. from the Defendants. Therefore, the Defendants asserted that they are liable as tort.

On the other hand, the Defendants asserted that, at the time of the above work, the Plaintiff was responsible for moving the cell board set up on the ground floor to the scamet installed at the scamet, and then leaving the scamet without any reason, regardless of their own duties, the Plaintiff went back to the scamet that has already been fixed and fell, and the Plaintiff did not use the safety belt for himself, and therefore, the Plaintiff was not responsible for the accident.

2) Each judgment number (hereinafter the same shall apply).

) If Gap’s statements in Gap’s evidence 4 and 5 and the testimony of Eul’s witness D added the purport of the entire pleadings, the person who was listed above the batteries at the time of the instant accident was the Plaintiff and D’s previous work (the person who was in charge of the work to get off the batteries in the bloet).

. At the same time.

arrow